first crack at the orange stripey clio splitsies fabric. french seamed and meant for capri harem pants.
do the math's extremely intriguing and thought provoking post on how women dress got me, well, thinking. it's a little too intellectual for me to comprehend fully at the moment, i'll admit. do you ever go through periods of not really being able to concentrate on and understand the issue at hand? i don't know what's up, it's not like i'm in my luteal phase. perhaps all the working with fabric and not actually engaging in real live conversation with people deadens the philosophizin skillz. i'll remedy that over the next few days, our dance card is filling up. and then i'll read this excellent post again.
but for now i can latch on to one point of ethan's thoughts:
UPDATE: please read ethan's shout out in the comments following this post, our dialogue has prompted a rewrite which i've reposted below, original text still included. if this was a bad lead in the front man's eyes, this was a TOTAL MASSACRE of backing vocals on my part. if i didn't make it clear: ethan is all kinds of awesome, and even though i understood exactly where he was coming from, he makes it crystalline in the update.
here's ethan, he's left the original text X-ed out.
UPDATE: please read ethan's shout out in the comments following this post, our dialogue has prompted a rewrite which i've reposted below, original text still included. if this was a bad lead in the front man's eyes, this was a TOTAL MASSACRE of backing vocals on my part. if i didn't make it clear: ethan is all kinds of awesome, and even though i understood exactly where he was coming from, he makes it crystalline in the update.
here's ethan, he's left the original text X-ed out.
"I’ve been wondering for years about something in our commonplace culture that encourages women to please men many times over before pleasing themselves. Everywhere I look American women wax, buff, dress skimpily and strut, offering transient enjoyment and asking for transient approval. (UPDATE: This was a bad lead. I should have made it clear that I'm talking only about a very specific style, not female beauty and adornment in general. The topic of Levy's book is raunch culture, the idolization of porn and celebration of stripper-chic. Oonaballoona and team have called me out on this! I suspect that many of these women are talented fashion designers like Oonaballona herself: in no way did I mean to suggest that intelligence and looking good are antipodes. I am following Levy in lamenting a rising tide in American culture that glamorizes the sex industry and pressures women to appear sexually available. Don't take my word for it, just read the book.)
Traveling home yesterday from Sea-Tac to JFK I witnessed several thongs as low-cut jeans rode down. It’s kind of great, for me and other susceptible heterosexual males, anyway...but there’s a hollow note, a chime in the symphony that asks, “What is really going on here? Aren’t all these provocative bodies also supposed to house a brain that is my potential intellectual equal, if not my superior?”
really you have got to go read this post. i wish he would turn comments on because i'd love to hear what peeps are thinking about this. go have a look... then come back and tell me what you think about it to tide me over till i get my comprehensive thought back. (continue update: i guess i turned the comments on for him here. um, you're welcome? and, update, c'est fini.)
i do agree about the whole transient bit. for years, without ruggy asking me to, i dressed for his approval. i knew what colors, cut, and fit he liked, and i turned down my clashing. this was stupid and unnecessary, but even if ruggy didn't expect it, we're trained in a society that expects it. hard to rewire that, it still gets me sometimes.
that's not news, we all experience that in some form-- jobs, school, family... but what i wonder is: specifically as sewists who can make anything you might desire to put on your gorgeous bods, who do YOU dress for? because as i get better at sewing, i look at women with thongs giving a jolly wave to everyone behind them, at ladies with peplums and skinny jeans and hell, men with low rise pants that give Thong Chicks a serious run for their money, and instead of trends that i should be wearing, i see poor choices in fit. choices in color and cut that don't flatter the wearer-- they flatter the wearer's idea of "in".
as we packed for LA, i warned ruggy that he was going to be seeing a lot more craziness going on in my closet. as evidenced by my last fabric haul, i'm understanding now that vivid color looks best on me, and feels best on me. and i know now what cuts flatter me, so the craziness will FIT. of course he was all in on that. he never asked me to dress a certain way, and he loves the schizophrenic combinations i come up with. (well, he does appreciate a good booty hugging dress. but really, he likes my booty. i can hardly complain.)
but of course, i still dress for some approval. i love it when a stranger compliments me on a garment and i can say I MADE IT. (yes, i do usually say it in all caps.) is it different for us? are we looking for the same sort of approval as those dressing for society's current approval?
lots of questions... would love to know your answers...
(i'm going for my approval. and the ronald mcdonald harem pants did NOT make the cut.)